Acute ischemic stroke requires rapid treatment decisions that are strongly guided by emergency imaging. Admission computed tomography perfusion (CTP) is commonly used to estimate the ischemic core, representing irreversibly damaged tissue, and the penumbra, representing hypoperfused but potentially salvageable tissue. Follow-up diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is then used to define the final infarct. Existing imaging approaches primarily focus on core–penumbra segmentation or final-infarct prediction, but provide limited insight into how heterogeneous penumbral tissue evolves after treatment.
We propose a bi-temporal tissue phenotyping framework that links admission CTP signatures with follow-up DWI-defined tissue outcome using six outcome-aware region-of-interest classes. Admission tissue signatures are characterized using statistical, radiomic, and deep-learning features extracted from mJ-Net and nnU-Net representations. On a Stavanger University Hospital (SUH) cohort, salvaged and infarcted penumbra showed consistent feature-space separation (Δ̃cos = 0.146, p < 0.05), while core tissue showed minimal separation by subsequent fate. The largest separation was observed between initially non-hypoperfused tissue that later infarcted and healthy contralateral tissue (Δ̃cos = 0.460, p < 0.05). Cross-dataset evaluation on ISLES’24 showed similar trends, supporting the consistency of the observed feature-space patterns across cohorts. These findings suggest that admission CTP contains outcome-associated tissue information beyond conventional core-penumbra delineation.
Admission CTP (T1) is registered to follow-up DWI (T2), and the two label sets are intersected into six outcome-aware ROI classes. Each class pairs what the tissue looked like on admission with the fate it went on to have.
pen_brain penumbra, salvagedpen_fi penumbra, infarctedcore_brain core, salvagedcore_fi core, infarctedclb_brain contralateral, healthynhb_fi non-hypoperfused, infarctedsurvived progressed to final infarct
Four region-pair comparisons on the SUH cohort (n = 109) and on ISLES’24 (n = 149), all at patient level. The separation index Δ̃cos is the median per-patient gap between within-class and between-class cosine similarity of the CNN embeddings; higher means better separated by final tissue state.
Table I · Region-pair comparisons
| Feature | Test 1penb · penfi | Test 2coreb · corefi | Test 3nhbfi · penfi | Test 4nhbfi · clbb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUH cohort (n = 109) | ||||
| FE1 · baseline statistics | ||||
| mean | ✓ large | ✕ small | ✓ small | ✓ large |
| std | ✓ med. | ✕ small | ✕ small | ✓ large |
| skewness | ✓ med. | ✕ negl. | ✕ negl. | ✓ large |
| min | ✓ large | ✕ small | ✕ small | ✓ large |
| max | ✓ small | ✕ small | ✕ negl. | ✓ small |
| kurtosis | ✓ large | ✕ negl. | ✕ negl. | ✓ large |
| FE2 · GLCM radiomics | ||||
| Imc1 | ✓ large | ✕ small | ✕ negl. | ✓ large |
| Imc2 | ✓ med. | ✕ negl. | ✓ small | ✓ small |
| Correlation | ✓ large | ✕ negl. | ✓ small | ✕ small |
| MCC | ✓ large | ✕ small | ✓ small | ✓ small |
| Δ̃cos · FE3 mJ-Net | ✓ 0.146 | ✓ 0.031 | ✓ 0.127 | ✓ 0.460 |
| Δ̃cos · FE4 nnU-Net | ✓ 0.091 | ✓ 0.038 | ✓ 0.090 | ✓ 0.193 |
| ISLES’24 (n = 149) | ||||
| FE1 · baseline statistics | ||||
| mean | ✓ large | ✕ negl. | ✓ large | ✓ large |
| std | ✓ large | ✕ negl. | ✓ med. | ✓ large |
| skewness | ✓ med. | ✕ negl. | ✕ negl. | ✓ large |
| min | ✓ large | ✕ negl. | ✓ large | ✓ large |
| max | ✓ small | ✕ negl. | ✓ small | ✓ negl. |
| kurtosis | ✓ large | ✕ negl. | ✓ large | ✓ large |
| FE2 · GLCM radiomics | ||||
| Imc1 | ✓ med. | ✕ negl. | ✕ negl. | ✓ large |
| Imc2 | ✓ large | ✕ negl. | ✓ large | ✓ small |
| Correlation | ✓ med. | ✕ negl. | ✓ large | ✓ small |
| MCC | ✓ small | ✕ negl. | ✓ large | ✕ negl. |
| Δ̃cos · FE3 mJ-Net | ✓ 0.177 | ✓ 0.044 | ✓ 0.126 | ✓ 0.401 |
| Δ̃cos · FE4 nnU-Net | ✓ 0.140 | ✓ 0.042 | ✓ 0.094 | ✓ 0.115 |
FE1 and FE2: two-sided Mann–Whitney U with Benjamini–Hochberg FDR (α = 0.05) and Cliff’s d magnitude. FE3 and FE4: median Δ̃cos with a one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test. ✓ significant, ✕ not significant.
Penumbra is where admission imaging carries the most information about eventual fate: salvaged and infarcted penumbra separate across all four feature families, with medium-to-large Cliff’s d for the baseline and GLCM features. Core tissue does not, consistent with advanced ischemic injury already present at baseline. The largest separation throughout is Test 4, suggesting that tissue outside the admission hypoperfused area but later included in the final infarct already differs from healthy tissue at admission. The same pattern holds on ISLES’24 despite differences in centers, acquisition protocols, follow-up interval, and automated rather than manual admission annotations.
Table II · Normalisation and pooling ablation
| Normalisation · pooling | Test 1penb · penfi | Test 2coreb · corefi | Test 3nhbfi · penfi | Test 4nhbfi · clbb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mJ-Net | ||||
| none Mean | 0.068 | 0.018 | 0.209 | 0.181 |
| none Median | 0.091 | 0.023 | 0.213 | 0.215 |
| none Max | 0.033 | 0.015 | 0.085 | 0.119 |
| z-score Mean | 0.098 | 0.029 | 0.196 | 0.264 |
| z-score Median | 0.114 | 0.036 | 0.200 | 0.290 |
| z-score Max | 0.146 | 0.031 | 0.127 | 0.460 |
| nnU-Net | ||||
| none Mean | 0.019 | 0.009 | 0.061 | 0.085 |
| none Median | 0.023 | 0.011 | 0.074 | 0.099 |
| none Max | 0.011 | 0.004 | 0.024 | 0.051 |
| z-score Mean | 0.066 | 0.029 | 0.140 | 0.270 |
| z-score Median | 0.071 | 0.028 | 0.137 | 0.259 |
| z-score Max | 0.091 | 0.038 | 0.090 | 0.193 |
Median Δ̃cos on the SUH cohort; every entry is significant at p < 0.05. Bold marks the best value per test within each model. Z-score normalisation with max pooling was adopted as the single configuration for the reported CNN results.
Table III · Subgroup analysis, mJ-Net
| Subgroup | Test 1penb · penfi | Test 2coreb · corefi | Test 3nhbfi · penfi | Test 4nhbfi · clbb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stroke hemisphere | ||||
| Left hemisphere n = 53 | ✓ 0.133 | ✓ 0.028 | ✓ 0.124 | ✓ 0.466 |
| Right hemisphere n = 51 | ✓ 0.155 | ✓ 0.029 | ✓ 0.143 | ✓ 0.458 |
| Onset-to-CT time (median split, 1.22 h) | ||||
| < 1.22h n = 51 | ✓ 0.163 | ✓ 0.049 | ✓ 0.137 | ✓ 0.453 |
| ≥ 1.22h n = 54 | ✓ 0.137 | ✓ 0.023 | ✓ 0.122 | ✓ 0.448 |
Separation is consistent across left and right hemisphere strokes and across onset-to-CT timing, so it is not driven by lateralisation or by how early the patient was imaged. Four patients lack onset-to-CT data; bilateral and midline cases are excluded from the hemisphere split.
@inproceedings{rahman2026bitemporal,
title = {Bi-temporal Image-driven Acute Stroke Evolution Analysis},
author = {Rahman, Md Sazidur and Engan, Kjersti and
Kurz, Kathinka D{\ae}hli and Khanmohammadi, Mahdieh},
booktitle = {2026 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)},
year = {2026},
eprint = {2602.07535},
archivePrefix= {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.CV},
note = {In press}
}